Why So Many Men Were Taught to Hide Their Curls

CULTURE / MEN & HAIR

For some men, learning to wear their natural texture means unlearning years of messages about what their hair is supposed to look like.

“Neat.” “Clean-cut.” “Professional.”

Those words sound neutral. But when they’re applied to men’s hair, they can come with a surprisingly specific picture: shorter, controlled, freshly cut and not too far outside the expected shape.

For men with curly hair, that can mean learning how to reduce the texture before ever learning how to care for it.

And for Black men in particular, research shows that hair carries messages about much more than grooming. It can be tied to race, masculinity, belonging, professionalism and even how boys learn to see themselves.

 

Were men actually taught to hide their natural hair?

Sometimes explicitly. Often, much more subtly.

It might have sounded like being told to get a haircut before an important event. Keep the hair lower for an interview. Make it look “neater.” Brush it down. Cut it before school starts.

None of those comments necessarily says, your natural texture is bad.

But repeated often enough, the message can become: the closer your hair is to a particular standard, the more acceptable you look.

Researchers studying hair experiences among African American men have found that these messages can begin early and come from family, peers, schools and other parts of everyday life.

IT DOESN’T HAVE TO SOUND LIKE “HIDE YOUR CURLS”

Hair messages can show up as ideas about what looks neat, grown-up, attractive, masculine or appropriate for work.

Over time, those ideas can influence which styles someone feels comfortable wearing at all.

 

What does masculinity have to do with hair?

Hair is one of the ways we signal identity, whether we consciously mean to or not.

And conventional ideas about masculine grooming have often rewarded a certain kind of control: a fresh cut, defined edges, limited length and a style that looks deliberately maintained.

There is nothing wrong with liking a fade or keeping your hair short. Plenty of men genuinely prefer it.

The difference is whether short hair is a choice or the only version of yourself you learned was acceptable.

Formal grooming rules make that distinction particularly visible. Researchers who examined U.S. military standards found that male service members faced considerably narrower hairstyle options than female service members, including restrictions on braids, twists and locs.

So the idea that men’s hair should fit within a smaller range of “acceptable” styles has not existed only in somebody’s imagination. In some spaces, it has literally been written into the rules.

 

Why is this especially complicated for Black men?

Because now we’re talking about both masculinity and race.

Afros, locs, twists, braids and other styles associated with Black hair have repeatedly been caught up in arguments about what counts as “professional,” “appropriate” or “well-groomed.”

Race-based hair discrimination has been documented in schools and workplaces, and researchers have found that Black people can receive negative messages about their texture and hairstyles from childhood onward.

A 2020 study based on hair autobiographies from African American men and women found that texture, length and hairstyle were among the most common ways hair became a source of rejection or “othering.” Those experiences happened in public spaces like schools, but also within families.

There is one important caveat: much of the largest body of hair-discrimination research has focused specifically on Black women. We shouldn’t automatically pretend every finding applies identically to Black men.

But research focused specifically on Black men is growing—and it makes clear that hair is part of how racial and gender identity are learned and negotiated.

For some men, wearing their curls isn’t just trying a new hairstyle. It can mean questioning an old rule about how they were supposed to look.

 

And what about the barbershop?

This is where the story gets more interesting, because the barbershop is not simply a place where Black men were taught to cut their hair short.

Research on Black men’s hair stories describes the barbershop as a place of community, ritual, identity and belonging.

One study of Black men found recurring themes around paternal traditions, connection to the Black community and, sometimes, distress related to hair care.

Another study involving 29 Black men found that remembered hair experiences carried different kinds of messages: cultural pride, negative ideas about certain hair and messages about self-worth and personal choice.

So the relationship is complicated.

A fresh line-up can be tradition. A fade can be self-expression. Going to the barber with your father can be a memory someone treasures for life.

The issue isn’t the haircut.

It’s whether men also feel free to choose something else.

THE BARBERSHOP WAS NEVER JUST ABOUT HAIR

Studies of Black men’s hair experiences describe barbershops as spaces where boys and men can learn about culture, community, appearance and identity.

That makes the person holding the clippers more influential than we might think.

 

Why can growing your curls out feel so unfamiliar?

Because having curly hair and actually knowing your curly hair are two different things.

If your hair has been kept short for most of your life, you may reach adulthood without knowing what it looks like at six inches long, how it behaves when it’s wet, what happens when you stop brushing it out or which products actually bring out the curl.

Suddenly growing it can feel like discovering hair you technically had the entire time.

And then come the questions.

Do I need conditioner?

Am I supposed to comb this?

Why did nobody tell me my hair did that?

That learning curve is not proof that curly hair is inherently difficult. Sometimes it simply means nobody taught you the routine.

 

Does wearing longer curls make a man less masculine?

No.

A curl pattern does not have a gender.

Neither does hair length, even though cultures have attached gender expectations to both.

Masculinity is also not one fixed thing. Sociological research on Black masculinity in particular has moved away from treating Black men as though they all perform masculinity in one uniform way, instead documenting much broader and more complex experiences of male identity.

So a buzz cut can be masculine. A huge Afro can be masculine. Shoulder-length curls can be masculine. Locs can be masculine.

Or none of those hairstyles need to prove masculinity at all.

 

Is the definition of “men’s hair” finally getting bigger?

It certainly looks bigger than it used to.

Men are wearing curls longer, experimenting with shape, growing Afros and locs, trying braids and twists and actually learning what conditioners, gels, creams and diffusers do.

That doesn’t mean the old expectations have disappeared. Hair discrimination still exists, and some schools, workplaces and institutions continue to regulate hairstyles in ways that can disproportionately affect people with Afro-textured hair.

But there is more room to question why a particular hairstyle was ever considered the default in the first place.

And maybe that is the more interesting part of the natural-hair conversation for men.

Not convincing every man to grow his hair.

Giving him enough information—and enough freedom—to decide whether he wants to.

 

The bottom line

Some men genuinely love keeping their hair short. Others discover curls they never realized they had once they finally let their hair grow.

Both are natural-hair choices.

The difference is being able to choose without assuming that curls are automatically messy, long hair is automatically less masculine or one particular haircut is the price of looking respectable.

Your natural texture was never the opposite of being well-groomed.